Choose Archive (*.APC) command (File > File > Example > Archive (*.APC)) option to access example AutoPIPE models installed with the application.
See list of files available below:
| File name | Type of analysis | Details | Model Image |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAMS_SUMMARY_1 |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T2, |
||
| ADAMS_SUMMARY_2 |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T2, U1 Soil Stiffness |
||
| AP50SR1 |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1, U1, Modal, M1 |
See AutoPIPE's help> Workbook> Example Systems> Steam Relief (Time History) Example This model illustrates the steps required to define and perform a Steam Relief and Time History analysis in AutoPIPE. |
|
| APHAM1 |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T2, Modal, M1 |
See AutoPIPE's help> Workbook> Example Systems> Water Hammer (Time History) Example This section illustrates the steps required to define and perform a Water hammer and Time History analysis in AutoPIPE. |
|
| ASME_B311_With_HDPE_Rev0 |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T5, U1 Soil Stiffness |
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> ASME B311 With HDPe Tutorial document AutoPIPE version 9.6 supports ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel code case N-755-1 for using polyethylene pipes for class 3 buried piping system. This document provides a quick walk through for modeling, analyzing and generating output reports for a model with code as ASME B31.1 and with HDPE material defined. |
|
| ASME_ND_With_HDPE |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T5, U1 Soil Stiffness |
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> ASME ND With HDPE Tutorial document AutoPIPE version 9.6 would support AMSE Boiler and Pressure Vessel code case N-755-1 for using polyethylene pipes for class 3 buried piping system. This document would provide a quick walk through for creating, analyzing and generating output reports for ASME ND with HDPE material defined. |
|
| B313_APPENDIXS_EXAMPLE1 |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T2 Pressure Stiffening |
ASME B31.3 Appendix S: Piping System Stress Example
|
|
| B313_APPENDIXS_EXAMPLE2 |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T2 Pressure Stiffening |
ASME B31.3 Appendix S: Piping System Stress Example
|
|
| B313_APPENDIXS_EXAMPLE3 |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T2 |
ASME B31.3 Appendix S: Piping System Stress Example
|
|
| BUILDINGSETTLEMENT_1 |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1 |
||
| BUILDINGSETTLEMENT_2 |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1, U1 |
||
| Class1_tutorial |
Multiple analysis sets Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T4, P1-P4, E1-E2, Modal, R1 Pressure Stiffening Pressure Extension Hot Modulus |
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> documents: AutoPIPE ASME NB Example Tutorial document Provided a quick overview of what it means to model and analyze per ASME Nuclear Class 1 (NB). SQLite Report Manager Tutorial Users now have more power to create data reports with the information that is important to their teams with the new SQLite DB export capability and the Bentley SQLite Report Manager. |
|
| DNV-OS-F101-INITIALMODEL |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T3, E1-E2, P1-P3, U1-U2 Pressure Extension Soil Stiffness |
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> DNV OS F101 2012 Tutorial document This document provides a quick walk through for entering input data, analyzing and generating code compliance reports for a model with piping code selected as DNV Offshore 2012. |
|
| HDPE_With_ASME_B311 |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T5, U1 Soil stiffness |
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> ASME B311 With HDPe Tutorial document AutoPIPE version 9.6 supports ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel code case N-755-1 for using polyethylene pipes for class 3 buried piping system. This document provides a quick walk through for modeling, analyzing and generating output reports for a model with code as ASME B31.1 and with HDPE material defined. |
|
| HRMEXP |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1, H1, H2 |
See AutoPIPE's help> Workbook> Example Systems> Harmonic Analysis Example This section illustrates the steps required to define and perform a Harmonic force analysis in AutoPIPE. |
|
| Integ_auto1 |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1, E1-E2 |
||
| INTEG_AUTO1a |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1, E1-E2 |
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> documents: Microsoft Word Input Data Listing The Model Input Listing in Microsoft Word enables users to define custom reports and sub- reports that contain an output listing of the system geometry and properties, including a summary page and tables for pipe elements, beams, points, material, and load data, which is then exported to a Microsoft Word file that can be used to view, save, and/or print the report.
|
|
| INTEG_AUTO4 |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1, E1-E2 |
||
| ISO_FRP_14692 |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1, P1 Pressure Stiffening Pressure Extension |
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> ISO 14692 FRP Tutorial document This tutorial is intended towards users having adequate experience of AutoPIPE modeling and analysis. After completing this tutorial you will be able to understand modeling features provided by AutoPIPE for FRP piping, understand analysis options, result options and default combinations provided by AutoPIPE in regards to ISO 14692. |
|
| MSRS EXAMPLE |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, Modal, R1 Hot Modulus
|
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> AutoPIPE MSRS Example Tutorial document For piping systems subjected to multiple support response spectra (MSRS) or independent support motions (ISM), such as the case for piping systems supported on different buildings or at different floor levels, the motion of one set of supports could be quite different from the other. For such systems, the inertia or dynamic response can be analyzed using a uniform response spectrum analysis with a calculated single envelope spectrum for the different support groups. |
|
| PIPESOIL |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1, P1 Pressure Stiffening Pressure Extension Soil Stiffness
|
See AutoPIPE's help> Workbook> Example Systems> Water Hammer (Time History) Example The purpose of the following example system is to demonstrate the procedure required to: Calculate soil properties using AutoPIPE and ASCE method Verification of values with hand calculations Determine the location of critical piping points to be defined for the above to below ground (transition) piping system shown in the Figure below. |
|
| SEISMICTHERMAL_1 |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T2 |
||
| SEISMICTHERMAL_2 |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1-T2 |
||
| SOILOVERBURDEN_1 |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1 |
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> Soil Overburden and Seismic Wave Propagation in AutoPIPE Tutorial document. The analysis of a buried piping system requires special modeling consideration. This is because the restraint (support) provided by soil surrounding a buried pipe is continuous. As AutoPIPE analysis is based on discretely defined points, so an accurate model of the soil's restraint capabilities would require the definition of a number of closely spaced piping points. Each soil point would then require a set of support springs which model the stiffness(es) provided by the soil at that point. |
|
| SOILOVERBURDEN_2 |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1 |
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> Soil Overburden and Seismic Wave Propagation in AutoPIPE Tutorial document. The analysis of a buried piping system requires special modeling consideration. This is because the restraint (support) provided by soil surrounding a buried pipe is continuous. As AutoPIPE analysis is based on discretely defined points, so an accurate model of the soil's restraint capabilities would require the definition of a number of closely spaced piping points. Each soil point would then require a set of support springs which model the stiffness(es) provided by the soil at that point. |
|
| SupportOptimizationTutorial |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1, E1-E2 Support Optimization |
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> Support Optimization Tutorial document. This tutorial provides an overview of the Support Optimization feature and a step-by-step workflow to set up and solve a model. |
|
| UpheavalBucklingTutorial |
Non-Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1, P1 |
See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> Upheaval Buckling Tutorial document. In this tutorial, we will review how AutoPIPE’s upheaval buckling calculator can be used to prevent upheaval buckling on buried piping both onshore and offshore. AutoPIPE can use both the initial overbend geometry and the compressive axial force due to loading to produce a recommended soil depth. Users are then expected to update to the new soil depth to prevent upheaval buckling propagation. |
|
| WALKTHRU |
Linear Analysis Load cases: GR, T1, E1, W1, P1
|
Small model used by technical support to validate the program is installed, licensed, and capable of generating a Stress Isometric. See AutoPIPE Help> Supplemental Documentation> documents:
|