Tow Motions and Accelerations


Introduction

Tow loading may be generated from motions, accelerations, or RAO's. This post describes each method of generating inertia loading and some of the options that are available in Tow.

Motions

The motion data is entered as translational accelerations and rotational motions with an angle and period. This input is organized such that it is easy to enter data provided by other publications. For instance, DNVGL-ST-N001 (0030/ND) provides a table of motion criteria based upon general vessel information:

Length (m) Width (m) L/B Block Coeff Period (s) Roll (deg) Pitch (deg) Heave (g)
>140 <30 N/A <0.9 10 20 10 0.2
>76 >30 N/A <0.9 10 20 12.5 0.2
<=76 <=23 >=2.5 <0.9 10 30 15 0.2
<=76 <=23 >=2.5 <0.9 10 25 15 0.2
<=76 <=23 <2.5 <0.9 10 30 30 0.2
<=76 <=23 <2.5 <0.9 10 25 25 0.2

note that these values are a sample of values provided and are not applicable to every possible case

The DNV data referenced from the link above is intended to be used with the tow motions input line only when site specific data, such as that from physical model testing or computational analysis is not available.

SACS takes the motion data and converts it into angular accelerations using the following equations:

where;

is the angular acceleration

  is the roll/pitch angle

is the period


note:
angular frequency,
 

SACS provides five different ways to consider gravity, which are input on column 77 of the MOTION line in the tow input file:

Heave Normal to Barge

Heave Vertical

Consider a vessel with rotational motion , rotation period , translational acceleration and translation acceleration . The inertial loading for an element of mass at distance, and angle  from the center of motion would be calculated as follows:

Vessel Motion

Equivalent Lateral Forces

Force Due to Translational Acceleration

Force Due to Angular Acceleration

Force Due to Gravity (G or L options)

Force Due to Gravity (H or V options)


Equivalent Vertical Forces

Force Due to Translation Acceleration

Force Due to Angular Acceleration

Force Due to Gravity (G option)

Force Due to Gravity (L option)

Force Due to Gravity (H option)

Force Due to Gravity (V option)

The total force for a given element in a given direction would be the summation of the force components due to translation acceleration, angular acceleration and gravity component. Note that the force due to angular acceleration is the only component affected by the relative location of the center of motion.

Accelerations

The acceleration input is similar to the motions input except that the rotational motion data is entered as rotational accelerations. There are no gravity options on the acceleration input line so gravity accelerations must be entered as translational accelerations in addition to the surge and sway translational accelerations.

Since there are not gravity options, the calculation of inertial forces is simpler. Consider the same vessel with rotational acceleration , translational acceleration and translation acceleration . The inertial loading for an element of mass at distance and angle  from the center of motion would be calculated as follows:

Vessel Acceleration

Equivalent Lateral Forces



Equivalent Vertical Forces

It should be noted that the user can manually calculate the equivalent accelerations of the motions input using the equations from the previous section and enter them as acceleration input. The user will get the same results from both analyses.

SACS Example

The attached example as a single mass of 10 kips which is located at joint 0266 (53ft,-3ft,28.533ft). The center of rotation is defined at (0,0,0) and the coordinate system has been rotated so that the longitudinal direction is X, the transverse direction is Y and the vertical direction is Z. Two motion cases are considered with each of the five gravity options.

SACS Example Model

Case Roll Angle Period Pitch Angle Period Heave
P+H     12.5 10 0.2
R+H 20 10     0.2

note: SACS motion load cases typically are labeled using rotational motion +/- heave. For example P+H would be Pitch + Heave and R-H would be Roll - Heave.

The equivalent accelerations were calculated for each gravity option using the equations from the previous section.

Case

Gravity Option

X Acceleration

[G]

Y Acceleration

[G]

Z Acceleration

[G]

Rx Acceleration

[Rad/Sec²]

Ry Acceleration

[Rad/Sec²]

Z Acceleration

[Rad/Sec²]

P+H B     0.2   -8.60-2  
P+H G -0.2164   1.1763   -8.60-2  
P+H L -0.2164   0.1763   -8.60-2  
P+H H -0.2597   1.1716   -8.60-2  
P+H V -0.2597   0.1716   -8.60-2  
R+H B     0.2 -0.138    
R+H G   0.3420 1.1402 -0.138    
R+H L   0.3420 0.1402 -0.138    
R+H H   0.4104 1.1280 -0.138    
R+H V   0.4104 0.1280 -0.138    

Note: The acceleration reported in the listing file of the attached sample is related to the center of motion of the vessel therefore the components of the rotational acceleration are not included in this report.

As an example, the R+H-G case equivalent accelerations will be calculated here:

After running the tow analysis the resulting inertial forces are reported for each load case:

Load Case Fx Fy Fz
PH-B   -0.764 -2.080
PH-G   -2.928 -11.843
PH-L   -3.361 -1.843
PH-H   -2.928 -11.796
PH-V   -3.361 -1.796
PHBA   -0.763 -2.080
PHGA   -2.923 -11.840
PHLA   -2.923 -1.184
PHHA   -3.363 -11.800
PHVA   -3.363 -1.800
RH-B 1.222   -4.270
RH-G 4.642   -13.667
RH-L 4.642   -3.667
RH-H 5.326   -13.546
RH-V 5.326   -3.546
RHBA 1.222   -4.273
RHGA 4.642   -13.673
RHLA 4.642   -3.673
RHHA 5.326   -13.553
RHVA 5.326   -3.553

Note: the load case naming is a bit different for this example. The load case PH-G indicates Motions P+H with gravity option G, and PHGA is the equivalent Acceleration load case.

The resulting loads are almost identical, aside from small rounding errors.

communities.bentley.com/.../towtest.zip